Gary Kirsten’s resignation is tied to dissatisfaction with the PCB’s new selection policy, which grants full control of team selections to the selection committee.
Gary Kirsten, who played a crucial role as Pakistan’s white-ball cricket coach, has reportedly decided to step down due to ongoing disputes with the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and red-ball coach Jason Gillespie.
Kirsten’s resignation is tied to dissatisfaction with the PCB’s new selection policy, which grants full control of team selections to the selection committee, limiting the coaches’ influence. The change in policy has led to frustration, especially among those in key coaching roles, who feel it hampers their ability to shape the team effectively.
Also Read:- Google Celebrates 2024 ICC Women’s T20 World Cup with Historic Doodle and Equal Prize Money Milestone
Additionally, his disagreements with Gillespie over strategy and coordination have further strained Kirsten’s position within the coaching staff.
This resignation could disrupt Pakistan’s preparations for their significant upcoming tour of Australia. The timing of this decision has generated discussions within the cricket community, raising questions about the board’s management style and team stability.
Known for his strategic insights and experience, Kirsten previously coached India to their 2011 World Cup victory and had been expected to bring similar success to Pakistan’s white-ball team. His exit could impact the team’s morale and performance, particularly given his recent work with them on refining their white-ball strategies.
Fans and analysts alike are now concerned about how the PCB will manage this shift, especially with the board’s ongoing efforts to streamline its selection process amid a more prominent role for the selection committee.
Also Read:- Who is Milind Kumar, Who Hit 16 Fours and 5 Sixes?
Kirsten’s departure also brings attention to the challenges faced by international coaches when dealing with changing governance structures in cricket boards, where roles, responsibilities, and influence often shift, sometimes causing friction among senior team members. With his departure, the PCB may need to reassess its approach to team management to avoid similar challenges in the future.